How Do You Know Warmonger Penalty Civ 6

Do yous care virtually warmongering penalties? What about when you are playing a Civ like Macedon or Persia? Do you even attack friends sometimes if you experience like it? Does it thing fifty-fifty if information technology is egregious penalty?
When playing Macedon for example do you feel information technology best to wait for a casus belli? or is it also important to keep warring to reap benefits fifty-fifty if y'all assail friends and get worst warmongering penalties?
Since the introduction of the "we are winning they fear the states" huge penalisation, I've stopped caring for the warmonger one, as long as I aim a science victory. I'll finish up with anybody chain denouncing me whatever I exercise, so I might as well conquer my landmass, and declare war equally soon as I see a settler nearby.
They can't complain about my warmongering if they're dead
I play strategically, declaring war when necessary to further my plans. My current game, which is almost over, has me playing as Kingdom of norway on a huge continents map at Emperor level. I started by eliminating Greece, my nearest neighbor, then attacked Spain and took all his cities on the continent and a small i over on the next continent, just north of Australia. Commonwealth of australia had declared state of war on me and just wouldn't make peace, then I attacked him and took his capital and some other coastal metropolis. Once I had those, I made peace with Kingdom of spain past returning the city north of Australia. I made peace with Australia, keeping those ii cities, and headed s for my existent target - Kongo who had a huge cultural atomic number 82. They were surprisingly tough - I ran into three tank armies and helicopters, but I took their upper-case letter and another big metropolis and made peace with them. Every bit you can imagine, my warmongering is in triple digits with anybody only Alexander, but information technology hasn't afflicted my play in the to the lowest degree.
Slayan Warlord

Joined:

Jan 28, 2006

Messages:

164

everyone hates me so I just do what I desire with attacking others
From my indicate of view, it seems that once you get tagged every bit a warmonger, it is virtually impossible to get rid of it. So, in one case they all phone call me 1, when needed, I prove that they are right. The biggest gripe that I have well-nigh is, I can never denounce whatsoever ane who has denounced me. When the Civ that denounced me time has expired, they immediately practice it over again, and I become no chance to denounce them.
I can't really see the point of just treating civ like an countless wargame then I don't ignore warmongering points (because if I would ignore warmongering points, the game would exist an endless wargame). I similar to employ all aspects of the game. When it comes to war I generally use a CB those times I desire a ane. This usually means that by the endgame, a couple of civs hate me, a couple of civs likes me and the rest is unfriendly or neutral. Of course since the last patch if I am (or probably when) close to a win, well-nigh is unfriendly, but that is ok, I am winning after all, I tin can take it.
Kyro Prince

Joined:

December ii, 2014

Letters:

599

What penalty? There's absolutely nothing that actually penalizes a player in whatever way for warmongering. In fact you are penalized for not warmongering. They will hate you regardless, warmonger or not. particularly more so with the newest diplomatic hit for winning.
The whole warmongering penalty system is a lie designed to pacify players who don't prefer war in Civilization. Oh look at that place are "consequences" for warmongering. Aye correct.
If I rely heavily on trade for civilities I care. If I already take 1 of most everything... I don't intendance.
After a certain bespeak, the warmonger penalities volition be so high that it doesn't really matter what yous try. So I just joint war with someone and commonly they don't heed what I exercise that much. Other than that, I avoid attacking good trading partners and pick targets they don't like. But usually these are the people I desire to joint war with. Since the other person in a joint state of war doesn't care that much virtually what you do, yous're better off just always vying for a joint state of war and non caring about anything else. If you tin can win fast then they won't get too jealous of you winning but by that fourth dimension yous tin can always bop them off as needed.
The thing is in Civ 6, nobody is peculiarly intresting in dogpiling. In previous games where there was invite to join war, you'd accept AIs coming to the aid of their friends or just joining in confronting you lot or with y'all because it's a adept opportunity. In 4 for case, if you attacked into a bloc of friends, it would be similar fighting them all. Here, they don't actually intendance if their friends die beyond some worthless denouncements or not and but become picked off one by one. It's sorta why diplomacy is a joke in this game.

The result is I don't fifty-fifty casus belli at all later on the medieval era. I commonly maintain one solid ally, and if the rest disagree, then they tin be conquest targets too, so I don't care what they call back.

Only just in case, get some declarations of friendships going right before you declare war on a target. That mode, the other civs can't even denounce y'all or fifty-fifty become in the way for a long while.

Also, chances for liberation might help a bit since liberating a city will decrease your warmonger penalisation. In those cases you might care a fleck more.

In addition, it'due south besides not a bad idea to have someone like Gorgo not be your partner since she doesn't intendance about you going to war in the commencement place. Ironically, she may even approve especially considering your victims volition exist forced to concede things to you meaning Gorgo will not like them. In these cases you tin can sometimes have a 3 mode alliance.

Final edited: Aug 20, 2017
Kurnn Warlord

Joined:

Jul 31, 2017

Letters:

123

Gender:

Male

Location:

Sweden

I similar to assault people without getting to much warmonger, or exist able to reduce it by liberation.
You can murder a whole town in the stoneage without anyone caring....because who would know?

What happens in our mod time when anyone, whatever their reason may be, using bio weapons? They get the whole world against them.
And what happens when to 2 of the most powerful military nations in the world "just" threatens to apply nuclear weapons?

Call up about it. Warmonger isnt just a cool feature in civ. It's kinda "existent" too.
LedStone Chieftain

Joined:

Aug 2, 2017

Messages:

24

Gender:

Male

Diplomatically I don't care I mainly just intendance nearly the amenity furnishings
I play @emperor, and have a trend to get for Domination, or at least military-conquest in the early game. I dont worry about penalties for warmongering. I do spotter out for war-weariness (I much adopt brusque wars), just I will DOW to steal a settler or worker, regardless of the warmongering penalty (also to take a metropolis, exist it AI or City State). I would Non DOW merely if I call back that I volition non be able to keep the settler, architect or urban center (too many enemies in shut proximity/city is too strong), but the DOW penalty has no deterrent outcome on me...all I ask is, "Can I get away with information technology?"
I do non use this same philosophy mid to late game. I seems that the atrocities committed prior to yard AD are more easily overlooked (or forgiven) than sins of the nowadays (say post 1500 Ad).

That's simply me, just I feel that the pre-industrial ages are a lot more of a free-for-all than later years.
Now y'all cannot reasonably get an ally in that location is footling value on diplomacy beyond the first 50 turns. I go to war when I desire but I still casus or formal as it's a good habit in the hope they fix things.
Esperr King

Joined:

Jun 22, 2012

Messages:

868

You don't need the A.I to like you for annihilation, so warmongering penalty is completely irrelevant. If they have a lux you wan't just take it. They tin't trade techs anymore, and enquiry pacts aren't worth it.
Kurnn Warlord

Joined:

Jul 31, 2017

Messages:

123

Gender:

Male person

Location:

Sweden

And miss out on tons of gold you get for selling surplus resources?
Agreed. It stinks to be sitting on 2-iii copies of multiple luxes in the tardily game with no willing buyers.
Esperr Male monarch

Joined:

Jun 22, 2012

Messages:

868

Golden isn't linked to annihilation except rushing anymore. You spam hubs in every city with internals anyway, gold is never an result.
If y'all are trying to get a fast science win every penny tin can help get those great people.
Kurnn Warlord

Joined:

Jul 31, 2017

Messages:

123

Gender:

Male

Location:

Sweden

I play on Emporer. Untill you get to the indicate where yous can spam hubs....golden is life.